Published: 16:07, March 15, 2022 | Updated: 21:56, March 15, 2022
Indian court upholds Karnataka state's ban on hijab in class
By Reuters

People holding placards and candles in Bengaluru, India, protest against banning Muslim girls from wearing the hijab in educational institutions in southern Karnataka state, Feb 19, 2022. (AIJAZ RAHI / AP)

NEW DELHI – An Indian court upheld on Tuesday a ban on wearing of the hijab in classrooms in the southern state of Karnataka, a ruling that could set a precedent for the rest of the country which has a big Muslim minority. 

The ban last month by the state sparked protests by some Muslim students and parents, and counter-protests by Hindu students. Critics of the ban say it is another way of marginalizing a community that accounts for about 13 percent of Hindu-majority India's 1.35 billion people. 

"We are of the considered opinion that wearing of hijab by Muslim women does not form a part of essential religious practice," Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi of the High Court of Karnataka said in the judgement. 

READ MORE: Indian students block roads as row over hijab in schools mounts

He said the government had the power to prescribe uniform guidelines, dismissing various petitions challenging the order. 

The High Court order is against individual rights, against fundamental rights and against religious rights. 

Abdul Majeed, Karnataka chief, Social Democratic Party of India 

Ahead of the verdict, Karnataka authorities announced closures of schools and colleges and imposed restrictions on public gatherings in some parts of the state to prevent potential trouble. 

Karnataka, home to the tech hub of Bengaluru, is the only southern state ruled by Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and holds state assembly elections next year. Critics say the BJP could benefit from the division between Hindus and Muslims, though the party says the hijab ban had nothing to do with their political ambitions. read more 

Students who had challenged the ban in court had said wearing the hijab was a fundamental right guaranteed under India's constitution and an essential practice of Islam. Reuters could not immediately contact the challengers. 

Abdul Majeed, Karnataka chief of the Social Democratic Party of India that mainly fights for Muslim causes, said he would speak with the petitioners and their parents to help them challenge the verdict in the Supreme Court. 

ALSO READ: Senior schools reopen in India's Karnataka amid hijab row

"The high court order is against individual rights, against fundamental rights and against religious rights," he said. "Muslim women have been wearing the hijab for hundreds of years." 

In this Feb 26, 2022 photo, a veiled Indian Muslim student, her hands decorated with henna, talks to her friend as they gather to meet student activists in Kundapur in district Udupi, Karnataka state, India, where Muslim students found themselves at the center of a debate over hijab bans in schools. (AIJAZ RAHI / AP)

'DEEPLY DISAPPOINTING' 

Other Muslim politicians, including the former chief minister of Jammu and Kashmir state, called the verdict "deeply disappointing". 

"On one hand we talk about empowering women yet we are denying them the right to a simple choice," she wrote on Twitter. "It isn’t just about religion but the freedom to choose." 

Karnataka ministers told reporters that Muslim girl students who are staying away from class in protest against the ban should respect the judgement and rejoin school. 

The ban had led to protests in some other parts of the country too and drew criticism from the United States and the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation. 

Last month, Federal Home Minister Amit Shah said he preferred students sticking to school uniforms instead of any religious attire. Currently, there is no central law or rule on school uniforms across the country, but the Karnataka ruling could prompt more states to issue such guidelines. read more 

India has experienced several deadly Hindu-Muslim riots since independence in 1947, but hardly any of them in the south.