2024 RT Amination Banner.gif

China Daily

News> Hong Kong> Content
Friday, September 22, 2017, 01:16
Patten contradicts himself, dodges key question
By Luis Liu and Willa Wu
Friday, September 22, 2017, 01:16 By Luis Liu and Willa Wu

HONG KONG - Hong Kong's last governor on Thursday contradicted himself when discussing his views on the three jailed student activists – who had encouraged violent behavior in the city and helped ignite the illegal “Occupy Central” movement. 

Chris Patten, wrapping up his four-day visit to Hong Kong by delivering a speech at the University of Hong Kong (HKU), also dodged questions about the legality of "Hong Kong independence". 

Taking a question from China Daily on whether or not he supports the jailed activists - Joshua Wong Chi-fung, Nathan Law Kwun-chung and Alex Chow Yong-kang, Patten denied he had ever said he supported the trio for what they have done during the storming of a restricted area in front of the government building in 2014. 

However, on the previous day, at a luncheon at the Hong Kong Democratic Foundation he said the student leaders were "principled young people" and "represent some of the values that helped make the world a better place".

This time Patten insisted he had only said he supported democracy.

The three student activists were sentenced to jail for their roles in the storming of the restricted area. The unlawful assembly involved hundreds of students and injured more than 10 security guards.

Veteran local political analyst Song Sio-chong said people who watched Patten speaking could see him contradicting himself. 

"He said he appreciates the student leaders' values. However, breaking laws and resorting to violence when fighting for ‘democracy’ are actually part of their values," the professor at the Research Center of Hong Kong and Macao Basic Law, Shenzhen University, argued. 

"We all support democracy but not through illegal means,” Song added.

His views were backed by Vice-President of the Chinese Association of Hong Kong and Macao Studies Lau Siu-kai. Lau said Patten’s inconsistent comments about Hong Kong’s political affairs showed his dilemma in wanting to woo the “pan-democrats” and young people, while trying to portray himself as an objective, neutral figure. 

Although Patten had frequently argued that "Hong Kong independence" was a "bad idea", he has never talked about the legality of the issue.  

In the question-and-answer section, Patten shied away from China Daily's question on whether or not "Hong Kong independence" is illegal. 

He replied by saying: "The Basic Law said all sorts of things that shouldn't be done in Hong Kong, like gay marriage and euthanasia. But that doesn't stop people from talking about them." 

Song, who is also a Basic Law expert, said both examples were factually incorrect. 

In the Basic Law, Hong Kong’s constitutional document, there is only one article – Article 37 – which mentions marriage. It stipulates that the freedom of marriage of Hong Kong residents and their right to raise a family freely shall be protected by law. It has no phrases forbidding gay marriage, Song said.

This was also the case with euthanasia, he added.

However, the very first article of the Basic Law stipulates that “the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region is an inalienable part of the People's Republic of China”. Therefore, an educated man should figure out whether or not “Hong Kong independence” is illegal, noted Song.

He said he hoped Patten would study the Basic Law before making such arguments.

luisliu@chinadailyhk.com

Share this story

CHINA DAILY
HONG KONG NEWS
OPEN
Please click in the upper right corner to open it in your browser !